Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 17:55
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 81
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 348
40% 311 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Nvidia(10DE 0984) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 28.6
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 28.1
23% 27.4 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 31.8
29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 180GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 150 167 153 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 173
Write 155
Mixed 155
SusWrite 157
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 24.3
83% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 72.4
DQ Mixed 32.7
30% 45.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
385GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 27.8
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 101
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.2 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
6.45% Terrible
Read 28.5
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.1
10% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.45%
Great: 22%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 500GB
105GB free, PID 6298
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 31.3
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 32.8
41% 30 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353435382D3032302E4130304C4620 0x80CE 0x4D33373842353737334448302D4348392020 0x0198 0x393930353435382D3032302E4130304C4620 0x80CE 0x4D33373842353737334448302D4348392020 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $273WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback