Cisco UCSB-B200-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCisco UCSB-B200-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSB-B200-M4
Memory249.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191112
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMar 02 '20 at 15:58
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 63
2-Core 132
47% 82.8 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 520
46% 391 Pts
64-Core 2,079
129% 2,079 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3pardata VV Multi-Path Disk Device 107GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3312
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 245 280 292 284 290 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40CB1-CRC 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 35.7
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 14.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $116
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $195Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback