Cisco DN1-HW-APL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive330% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemCisco DN1-HW-APL  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C220-M4S
Memory251.1 GB free of 255.992 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 18:20
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 755
71% 589 Pts
64-Core 2,665
165% 2,665 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cisco UCSC-MRAID12G 479GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 525 328 312 318 348 335 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
330% Outstanding
Read 3,535
Write 3273
Mixed 3,383
SusWrite 361
590% 2,638 MB/s
4K Read 139
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 140
462% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 483
368% 497 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 330%
Great: 330%
Cisco UCSC-MRAID12G 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1199 952 951 952 955 956 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
369% Outstanding
Read 3,426
Write 3,450
Mixed 3,472
SusWrite 994
636% 2,836 MB/s
4K Read 147
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 139
475% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 549
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 506
387% 523 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40CB1-CRC 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 50
MC Mixed 50.1
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback