Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime21.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 16:47
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 216
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 368
44% 340 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 1375) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4250
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 39.3
36% 42.6 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDTR250GB-3DL 250GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0816C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 161 50 65 30 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 477
Write 418
Mixed 11
SusWrite 88.2
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
466GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 167 168 169 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 162
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 167
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 1TB
413GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 29.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 31.8
42% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 13
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback