PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20160531 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Mar 06 '20 at 15:39 |
Run Duration | 397 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 389 314 319 318 318 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
425GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 105 102 100 104 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D21BCT1.16FN 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |