Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G3900-$36 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 76.7 57% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 97.8 8-Core 99.9 13% 98.9 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% EVGA(3842 3652) 1GB CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 15.4 Parallax 18.8 15% 17.6 fps	MRender 23.8 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 17.5 17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MB0500EAMZD 500GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 26 38 53 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 71.5 Write 53.7 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 46.8 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 1x4GB 3,708 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.7% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 9.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	462x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	403x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	259x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98