Today's hottest deals

Acer AOD270

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer AOD270  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE01_CT
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 11 '17 at 03:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N2600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Memory 26.2
1-Core 4.8
2-Core 8.4
11% 13.1 Pts
4-Core 12.1
8-Core 15.8
2% 14 Pts
64-Core 17.4
1% 17.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 25%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3600
Acer(1025 061F)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.8.1075
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.39% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.54 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.39%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 71.1
Mixed 17.1
38% 52 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.13
44% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 76.A302G.C4D0B 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.72% Terrible
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.7
4% 1.23 GB/s
Latency 278
14% 278 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.72%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AOD270 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer AOD270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback