Today's hottest deals

HP 27-k450na

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 27-k450na  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2B
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 09 '20 at 16:39
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.1% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 129
55% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 250
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2B2B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.22
3% 6.51 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.57
5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37/120G 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 117 36 44 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 44% Great: 60%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB
157GB free
Firmware: 0410
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 12
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 57%
JMicron H/W RAID0 2TB
931GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 35
Write 32.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 11.5
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 80%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
133GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 35
Write 31.2
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 36.7
43% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 39%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
526GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 10.3
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 43%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
428GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 35.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 1.3
32% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.92%
Great: 43%
ST310005 24AS 1TB
190GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 35.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 0.1
32% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 43%
WDC WD20 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 2TB
667GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 34.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 0.3
32% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 16.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback