Acer Predator G5900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G5900  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5900
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '20 at 00:47
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 86
2-Core 158
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Nvidia(10DE 087E) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 27.6
20% 29.9 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 25.4
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 74 44 88 88 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49% Average
Read 99.3
Write 101
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 71.2
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$55
124GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 103 104 100 103 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 172
Write 159
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 92.8
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 105%
Hitachi HCP725032GLA380 320GB
596GB free
Firmware: GM3OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 77.1
Write 76.7
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 76.8
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 029E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 95.7
42% 95.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G5900 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5900

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback