Asrock N68-S UCC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 06:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 43.8
2-Core 88.6
36% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 174
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB
Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 314.22
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 28.2
22% 33.1 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 24.9
20% 24.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 19 58 38 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 81.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 39.3
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 50%
VendorCo ProductCode 64GB
44GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 7.1 7.5 7.3 4.1 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 4.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 6.1
11% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-S UCC Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-S UCC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $9
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback