Lenovo 10A8S09902

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 10A8S09902  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 15 '20 at 13:25
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 395
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 37.2
31% 35.5 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 35
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 27 37 41 33 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
45% Average
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 34.3
62% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
145GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 89 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 91.9
60% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 RMR5030ME68F9F1600 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 14.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A8S09902 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10A8S09902

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback