Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 12:08
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 217
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 536
54% 440 Pts
64-Core 567
35% 567 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 140F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 85.4
72% 90.2 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 79.2
Splatting 78.2
76% 94.9 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 83%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 24.2
16% 20.1 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 21
Splatting 20.8
15% 18.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 888 917 992 1005 1015 1013 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 1,014
Mixed 966
SusWrite 972
226% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 28.7
114% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 455
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 621
469% 617 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 163%
Great: 181%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
220GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 384 413 413 424 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 357
Write 395
Mixed 351
SusWrite 404
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 25.6
81% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 224
171% 231 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G3B1 CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback