Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B85M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '20 at 14:03
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 203
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 563
57% 460 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.9% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 76.8
Parallax 66.8
64% 73.9 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 73.4
58% 71 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Blast 240GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 393
Mixed 314
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 41
150% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 205
190% 292 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
199GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 154 153 150 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 128
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 152
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B85M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B85M-D3H - $40

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback