bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 03:57
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 80.5
2-Core 192
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 479
49% 396 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 180
94% 128 fps
MRender 89.1
Gravity 126
Splatting 129
96% 115 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 349 353 356 358 358 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 461
Mixed 414
SusWrite 365
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 43.3
142% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 362
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 137 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 149
Write 125
Mixed 89
SusWrite 139
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1TB
179GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 25
Mixed 21
SusWrite 26
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3132383030434C372D3447425A4D 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 29.4
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback