Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime16.6 Days
Run DateMar 27 '20 at 20:46
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 360
45% 344 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2077 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.5% Good
Lighting 74
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 64.5
60% 70.5 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 73.1
Splatting 75.9
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 22 31 54 20 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 152
Write 84
Mixed 69
SusWrite 55.1
20% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.5
38% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 11.2
9% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 116 117 117 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 116
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.1% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 1,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback