PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151224 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '17 at 21:43 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
34.8%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.3%
Good
|
||||
70.3%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ KHX1866C10D3/ 16GB
1600, 1600, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples | 24x |
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples | 17x |
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 28x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $203 |