Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 614
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 870F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 161
Parallax 123
116% 142 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 161
Splatting 117
127% 161 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 158 159 159 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 327
Write 132
Mixed 181
SusWrite 150
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.2
4K Mixed 24.1
75% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 146
115% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
2TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 177 177 179 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 163
Mixed 70
SusWrite 177
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.9
258% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94%
Great: 113%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 8.5TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 84 35 28 18 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 1.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 40.2
8% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 12%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393931393831202839393839383129 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 34.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback