Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 15:25
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 338
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 20.8
18% 19.8 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 17.4
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 68 30 53 119 117 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 238
Write 205
Mixed 164
SusWrite 96.4
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 7.9
48% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 43.7
46% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 56%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
466GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 155 156 158 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 143
Mixed 89.7
SusWrite 156
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 105%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
142GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 79 81 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76.2
Write 83.9
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 79.8
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
370GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 98 100 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 99.1
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
484GB free, PID b200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 90 85 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 113
Write 100
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 88.5
104% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.3
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 52%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
9GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 7 9 9.7 7.9 9.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 7.2
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 7.8
17% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.4
Mixed 5.7
12% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 2.2
113% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.9
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback