Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TK81

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPackard EasyNote TK81  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TK81
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 00:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II N620 Dual-Core
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 80.3
30% 49.7 Pts
4-Core 79.8
8-Core 82
11% 80.9 Pts
64-Core 82.1
5% 82.1 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Acer(1025 0489) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 1.03
Reflection 1.19
Parallax 0.25
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OA7A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 76 94 84 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 98.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 87.2
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1334, 1334 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.2% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TK81 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TK81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback