Asus ET2010AG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus ET2010AG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTek ET2010AG
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '17 at 08:52
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 405e
Socket AM2/S1G2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 39.3
29% 40 Pts
4-Core 56.3
8-Core 56.8
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 8430) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 73.1
Write 69.2
Mixed 63
51% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.29
58% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Read 20
Write 2.94
Mixed 5.49
9% 9.48 MB/s
4K Read 4.29
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.007
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-H9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 2001 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET2010AG Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2010AG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback