Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 80.9 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 91.2 54% 82.4 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 192 24% 181 Pts	64-Core 194 12% 194 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	19% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 27.2 18% 27.3 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 23.6 21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 22%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 131 104 121 67 51 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.7% Poor	Read 243 Write 138 Mixed 166 SusWrite 97.4 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 14.5 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 3.1 33% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 12.4 DQ Mixed 119 78% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 Kingston 9905471-006.A02LF 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	MC Read 12 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 11.9 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666