| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H77-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130613 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 06 '20 at 17:12 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.2%
Good
|
67% 112 Pts
|
40% 297 Pts
|
15% 238 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Gigabyte(1458 34FC) 1GB
CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
12% 15.5 fps
|
15% 18.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 68 54 51 54 55 MB/s
|
33.3%
Below average
|
32% 144 MB/s
|
67% 21.2 MB/s
|
21% 28.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
70GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 56 50 54 52 MB/s
|
40.2%
Average
|
52% 70.5 MB/s
|
138% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.5%
Poor
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
24% 8.33 GB/s
|
57% 70.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 935 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 248x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 113x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 71x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 58x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 57x |
| HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 51x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $454 |