PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 339A |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130716 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 07 '20 at 12:26 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 59% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
40.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 148 55 56 57 57 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 180 181 179 182 182 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
460GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 26 26 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 907x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 285x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 204x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 417x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 191x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 129x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |