Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '22 at 22:14
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$315
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,107
99% 838 Pts
64-Core 2,171
134% 2,171 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 124
Parallax 107
90% 114 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 91.2
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 454 455 453 455 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 376
Mixed 407
SusWrite 449
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 50
177% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 234
191% 271 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 173 170 175 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 158
Mixed 105
SusWrite 172
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 25A3 4TB
295GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 88 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 186
Write 172
Mixed 110
SusWrite 88.3
180% 139 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.1
538% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 0.7
414% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 89%
Great: 105%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 119 119 119 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 118
155% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
308GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 141
Write 115
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 103
144% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
169% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 57%
SDXC Card 128GB
83GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 40.6
Write 39.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 19.3
44% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 5.8
392% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 45%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 40.1
Write 38.1
Mixed 34.4
SusWrite 19.4
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
100% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.2
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback