Today's hottest deals

MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime32.9 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$209
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 232
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 789
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 1,955
121% 1,955 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.70
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.4
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 66.3
61% 72.7 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 70.2
58% 70.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1449 1386 1375 1392 1343 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,971
Write 1,769
Mixed 993
SusWrite 1,431
397% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 63
222% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 804
DQ Mixed 810
625% 854 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 314%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15/8G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 29.8
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 9.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $557
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback