Acer Nitro AN515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Freed_KLS
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '20 at 23:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 322
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 24
Parallax 6.66
5% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 5.77
Splatting 13.6
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 497 533 246 184 84 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 570
Mixed 266
SusWrite 288
126% 573 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 52
193% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 515
DQ Mixed 296
246% 344 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 140%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 9905700-025.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.4% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 22.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-51 Builds (Compare 3,859 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback