Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X5400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X5400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X5400
Memory3.9 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '20 at 00:38
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X3 435-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 36.2
2-Core 77.9
40% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 96.2
8-Core 110
13% 103 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 23 29 33 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 51
Write 67.5
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 34
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.M8FM CT25664BA1339.M8FM Samsung M378B2873FHS-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 7GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29% Poor
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X5400 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X5400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback