Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M430

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Veriton M430  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS880M05
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 80
43% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 78.3
8-Core 80.8
11% 79.6 Pts
64-Core 81.8
5% 81.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315
Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
2.18% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 1.12
2% 2.64 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 1.93
Splatting 2.04
2% 2.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.18%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$45
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ADA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 38 44 29 33 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 18.4
Write 35.1
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 36
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
466GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 127 126 129 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 125
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M430 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback