Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 15:57
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 97
2-Core 186
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 360
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.1
0% 1 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.4
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 256 270 269 270 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 376
Write 268
Mixed 289
SusWrite 265
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 17
57% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 175
159% 243 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.8" 1280 720 HWP320C HP Z24nf
Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback