Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A78M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A78M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJan 25 '17 at 17:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 118
51% 84 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 156
24% 173 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3205) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 43.3
Parallax 43
38% 44.2 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 35
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 497
Write 105
Mixed 101
50% 234 MB/s
4K Read 7.83
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 6.91
62% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 50.8
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 7.07
26% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
138GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 123
Write 149
Mixed 119
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.16
60% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.9% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.2
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A78M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A78M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback