Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful C.A320M-K PRO
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 12:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$70
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 189
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 269
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 11
Parallax 6.84
4% 7.78 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.83
Splatting 0.04
3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 54 11 32 74 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 420
Write 212
Mixed 117
SusWrite 64.6
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 9.5
51% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 64.3
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 41.5
40% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston M378A1K43BB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback