Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 17:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 66
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 93.5
46% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 183
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.3.1
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.3% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 76
50% 66 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 51.1
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 17 18 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 163 168 168 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 137
Write 150
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 162
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
182% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Dark-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback