| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970A-G/3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160112 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 21 '22 at 03:54 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.3%
Good
|
61% 98.5 Pts
|
40% 320 Pts
|
26% 412 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.3%
Above average
|
60% 76.1 fps
|
34% 47.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 72 87 81 83 75 MB/s
|
65.9%
Good
|
74% 103 MB/s
|
131% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
4GB free, PID 009f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
13% 16 MB/s
| |||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.6%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
31% 10.7 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 359 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 115x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 113x |
| FX-8320AMD $95Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $224 |