Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '20 at 19:39
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$153 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 78.3 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 119 50% 80.5 Pts	4-Core 243 8-Core 420 40% 331 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Zotac(19DA 5527) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 90.2 Reflection 81.2 Parallax 77.1 74% 82.8 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 73.1 70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Blaze 240GB-$50 1,382 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM08.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 279 205 8.5 7.8 7.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 431 Write 364 Mixed 235 SusWrite 127 64% 289 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 15.2 60% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 59.9 75% 130 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 141GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 60 63 63 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 56.7 Write 55.7 Mixed 39 SusWrite 61.5 39% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 67%
WD WD7502AAEX-00Y9A0 750GB 4,731 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 303GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 59 Write 54.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 52.4 40% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 77%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 241GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 2.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 61.3 Write 59.5 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 1.1 56% 43.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 23GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.8 4.9 4.9 5 5 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 95.5 Write 4.8 Mixed 9 SusWrite 4.8 23% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 930GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	21% Poor	Read 100 Write 106 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 0.7 81% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 48%
WDC WD40 02FYYZ-01B7CB1 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.2% Average	Read 186 Write 163 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 0.1 122% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.9 177% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 21GB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 95 79 89 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 98.3 Write 71.7 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 93.6 104% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 6TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 162 173 170 169 167 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 87 Write 103 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 164 145% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.7 171% 2 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 12.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	566x
FX-8320AMD $153Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353