Today's hottest deals

Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 700Z3C/700Z5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP700Z5C-S03PT
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 22:20
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3635QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 178
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 382
43% 335 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.47
Reflection 5.85
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.45 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 7.74
5% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 239 189 196 145 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 0.2
Write 184
Mixed 331
SusWrite 195
41% 178 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 25.7
84% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 199
186% 286 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback