Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 11:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 465
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 38.7
38% 39 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 37.5
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JD 240GB 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2019
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 68 70 60 66 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 250
Write 195
Mixed 231
SusWrite 70.9
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 21.9
95% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 47.4
77% 148 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 193 195 197 196 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 148
Mixed 84
SusWrite 182
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-439.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback