Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V16.6  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V16.6
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 20 '22 at 09:01
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10200H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 94.4
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 659
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8535) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 64.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 23.8 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 98 96 93 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 817
Write 158
Mixed 194
SusWrite 99
68% 317 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 39.4
160% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 180
133% 180 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 169%
JD 240GB 240GB
46GB free
Firmware: Q0720A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 340 293 301 299 297 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 474
Mixed 455
SusWrite 330
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 56.8
187% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 140
166% 288 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
48.3% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V16.6 Builds (Compare 791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V16.6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $47
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback