Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics93.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 10:10
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 186
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 490
50% 404 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
Nvidia(10DE 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 125
Parallax 106
101% 118 fps
MRender 81.8
Gravity 114
Splatting 91.6
78% 96 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 119 134 136 135 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 501
Write 138
Mixed 284
SusWrite 127
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 78.1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 11.4
136% 32 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
95GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade Q9RZ3F1QMIC5HI-YGU 1x12GB
1 of 1 slots used
12GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 34.9
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback