Asus P5N-E SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5N-E SLI  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 14:57
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 26.7
2-Core 53.8
36% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 53.5
8-Core 54.7
7% 54.1 Pts
64-Core 55.5
3% 55.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTS
Nvidia(10DE 0420) 320MB
Ram: 320MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 5.53
Reflection 6.92
Parallax 1.94
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 5.09
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 298.10G 320GB
249GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 36 39 23 18 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 44
Write 27
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 26.8
24% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.9
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-E SLI Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback