Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	32% Below average	Memory 45.3 1-Core 57.3 2-Core 113 41% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 113 15% 111 Pts	64-Core 111 7% 111 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 3.27 Parallax 2.28 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 5.87 4% 4.08 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 120GB 3,401 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 320ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 119 131 124 128 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 350 Write 141 Mixed 193 SusWrite 125 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 32 118% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 166 125% 167 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-015.A00G 2x4GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	14x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	11x
RX 560AMD $500Bench 22%, 60,738 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
HyperX 120GBKingstonBench 67%, 3,401 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $65Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	2x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	1x

RAM
9905700-026.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 72%, 411 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	2x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x4GBSK_HynixBench 26%, 50 samples	2x