Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8259U 4,608 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 220 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 550 60% 476 Pts	64-Core 572 35% 572 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2074) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 11 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 12.2 9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 182 185 220 186 190 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.3% Below average	Read 128 Write 102 Mixed 82.9 SusWrite 194 29% 127 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 9.9 42% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 15.9 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-015.A00G 2x4GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 45.4 MC Write 47.3 MC Mixed 19.8 107% 37.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 28.7 SC Mixed 16 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	1,624x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	79x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $95Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 5,229 samples	62x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	54x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	35x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $69