Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SI
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120315
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 03:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 94
2-Core 175
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 418
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 473
29% 473 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 184
Parallax 185
131% 177 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 166
Splatting 122
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ST1000DM003-9YN162 240GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 103 34 26 25 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 9.5
Write 177
Mixed 14
SusWrite 59.1
15% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 24.5
77% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 31.9
30% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 105%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
10GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,327
Write 1,643
Mixed 1,523
406% 1,831 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 63.9
208% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 537
390% 509 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
493GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 166 168 169 166 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 164
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 168
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D3134393030434C382D3447425A4D 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 39.9
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback