ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 86D4
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 111 2-Core 213 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 592 57% 469 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 16,200 User benchmarks, average bench 26% HP(103C 86D4) 3GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	28.7% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 30.2 Parallax 36.2 30% 34.4 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 30.8 26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB 31,797 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: ADHA0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 708 747 544 322 218 317 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	145% Outstanding	Read 879 Write 700 Mixed 372 SusWrite 476 135% 607 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 57.7 190% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 651 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 410 327% 466 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 145% Great: 147%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 829GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 128 129 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 103 Write 74.8 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 129 67% 91 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 215% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 71%
ZTE MMC Storage 1GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	2.46% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.7 6% 4.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 12% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.46% Great: 3%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5624-001.A00G CB8GS2400.C8ET 16GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 27.2 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 97 41% 97 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx Builds (Compare 2,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec0xxx

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,690x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	453x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	940x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	540x
GeForce GTX 1050NvidiaBench 26%, 16,200 samples	329x

SSD
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	244x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	184x
MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 114%, 12,950 samples	143x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples	187x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	171x
HP26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 4,524 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback