Acer Aspire A715-72G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A715-72G  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Charmeleon_CFS
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 22:28
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 692
74% 591 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1260) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 31.1
27% 29.9 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 23.1
24% 30.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$81
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 353 376 396 404 395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 458
Write 291
Mixed 232
SusWrite 381
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 30.4
88% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 272
223% 319 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 859B CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 12.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A715-72G Builds (Compare 716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-72G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback