Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 07:03
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 188
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 469
50% 397 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 86.7
Parallax 88
79% 90.5 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 80.1
Splatting 76.3
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdsc2bb240g7n 01GR727 01GR730LEN 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N201LT34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 260 295 265 268 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 218
Write 314
Mixed 222
SusWrite 255
57% 253 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 25.6
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 186
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 71%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132
97GB free
Firmware: V5DOA73A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 59.3
Write 54.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 38.9
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback