Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	30.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1683 x 885 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20161219
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 03 '20 at 14:18
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 200 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 379 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 381 24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 78%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
win2012-0 2TB 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: F.QWB56W SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 50 50 52 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.8% Good	Read 165 Write 82.8 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 50.2 61% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 104% 0.7 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 224GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 16384, 16384, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769, 32769 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.1% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 17.7 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 130%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,142x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	823x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16