PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | HP ENVY TS 15 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1962 |
Memory | 9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20130419 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 09 '20 at 16:07 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
43.5%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1962) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
|
4.56%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 377 340 295 195 73 MB/s
|
95.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
60GB free, PID 1000, Samsung BAR Plus 64GB
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 23 24 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Ramaxel RMT3160EB68FAW1600 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples | 296x |
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples | 43x |
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 29x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 303x |
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples | 62x |
Radeon HD 8650GAMDBench 5%, 4,043 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $299 |