Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150920
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 00:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 75
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 188
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 330
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 115
Parallax 108
92% 112 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$41
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32040RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 490
Write 349
Mixed 201
76% 347 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 0.04
51% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 0.05
45% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 76%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
405GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 293
Mixed 165
173% 232 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.96
4K Mixed 0.37
135% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 153%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.5% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback