Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 08:25
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 241
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 753
74% 607 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 10.8
12% 13.3 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 15.4
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 11%
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389
Zotac(19DA 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 153
Parallax 161
130% 158 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 142
Splatting 108
111% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,433
Write 1,259
Mixed 1,236
292% 1,309 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 62.3
220% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 810
608% 812 MB/s
Poor: 184% Great: 288%
Intel SSDSC2BB120G6 120GB
17GB free
Firmware: G2010140
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 133 133 130 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 303
Write 134
Mixed 178
SusWrite 133
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 28.2
122% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 193
146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
321GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 117 116 122 116 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 108
Write 147
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 118
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
13GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 6 4.2 6.4 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 4.9
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3
209% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.3% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 20.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $671
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback