Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970A-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 20:44
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$153
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 127
60% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 387
37% 307 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Elitegroup(1019 1B01) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.73
Parallax 0.72
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 2.22
2% 2.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 110 110 128 121 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
70% Good
Read 131
Write 129
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 113
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-006.A 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970A-UD3P Builds (Compare 837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback